AI
Strict Mode
Content
Guideline
Manual Check
Click to upload or drag & drop .md  ·  .txt  ·  .html  ·  .markdown
×
or paste directly
Guideline is locked server-side. Users cannot modify it.

ContentGuard audits your content against 10 sections derived from Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines, Google Helpful Content Guidelines, and E-E-A-T best practices.

Audit Sections
1. Page Purpose — Does the page have a clear, beneficial purpose? Can a visitor understand within seconds what it's for?
2. Content Quality — Is the content specific (numbers, names, dates)? Free from filler? Factually accurate? Fresh and current?
3. Originality & Information Gain — Does it add something beyond the top 10 results? Original data, testing, or reporting?
4. E-E-A-T — Named author with verifiable credentials? Trustworthy? For YMYL topics: credentialed and peer-reviewed?
5. SEO Readiness — Dates visible, external links to primary sources, clear ownership, verifiable claims?
6. User Intent Alignment — Does it answer the query fully? Most important answer near the top? Does someone have what they came for?
7. Brand Voice & Trust — Varied sentence rhythm? Edited feel, not generated? Direct answers to headings?
8. Compliance & Safety — Factual claims accurate? No harmful misinformation? No contradictions of expert consensus?
9. Title Quality — Does the title accurately describe the page? Free from exaggeration or clickbait?
10. Actionability — Does each finding have a specific, concrete fix? Are priorities clear?
Scoring
Each section is rated pass, partial, or fail.
The overall score (0–100) reflects how many guideline rules your content meets.
90–100: Nearly all rules met  |  70–89: Most rules met  |  50–69: Several violations  |  0–49: Major violations
Issue Types
Critical — Guideline rule clearly violated. Must be fixed.
Improvement — Partially compliant. Specific fixes needed.
Suggestion — Minor enhancement for better compliance.
Positive — Correctly follows a guideline rule.
These items require opening the live page or researching the site externally. AI cannot verify these from raw text alone.
Click to cycle:
Links
External links point to primary sources (studies, official docs, original reporting)
All links are working and accessible (no 404s)
Links are relevant to the claim they support
No links to low-quality or spammy domains
Author & Attribution
Named author with verifiable professional profile
Author bio links to a real profile (LinkedIn, academic, publication history)
For YMYL content: author credentials are formal and verifiable
"Reviewed by" line present where appropriate
Production method described (how was this content created? If AI was used, is it disclosed?)
Content appears created to help people — not primarily to attract search traffic
Dates & Freshness
Published date is visible on the page
"Last updated" date is visible and accurate
Date reflects a genuine content review, not just a timestamp change
Content was actually updated when the date was changed (not just a date stamp refresh)
Site-Wide Signals
About page exists with clear organization/individual info
Contact information is present
Site has a focused topic area (not publishing on everything)
Content is not clearly templated across multiple pages
Reputation
External, independent sources mention this site or author (news, Wikipedia, expert references)
Awards, peer recognition, or expert endorsements present
No negative reviews, fraud reports, or credible criticism found
Page Context
Ads don't significantly interrupt or distract from content
Main content is immediately accessible without pop-ups
No deceptive design elements (buttons that do something different than expected)
Supplementary content (sidebars, related links) is not more prominent than main content
No sexually suggestive, shocking, or disturbing imagery on otherwise non-related pages
Review Results

Paste or upload content, then run the check.